Is Change Necessary?
I welcome a recent anonymous comment to an earlier posting "Don't try this at home." Referring to two-handed bowling and its success by Jason Belmonte and some of the bowlers in Bolivia.
The comment seemed to question my ability to change.
My answer is: Why change?
Is change necessary?
Since, mainly because of my age and stiffness in my back, I probably won't try two-handed bowling does that mean that I object to change?
To answer that, let me state that two weeks ago I bowled another 300 game followed four games later by a 290 game in a nine game tournament. Did I use a two-handed delivery? NO!
Did I, therefore, use the same delivery that I've been using for the past 20 years? NO!
Granted, my changes have been within the realm of single-handed deliveries, but the styles have changed from low-ball stance to mid-ball stance to high-ball stance back to mid-ball stance, with and without wrist support, four-step, five-step and multi-step (eight or more) deliveries to name a few. I've bowled 300 games and 800 series is just about every style of bowling that I've tried.
I will reiterate, that I personally will be very cautious if I ever do attempt a two handed delivery not because of being afraid to try something new, but cautious of my physical well being. I will never --- I repeat, never, advise someone not to try a new way to bowl. As I stated in that original Bowling Time: Don't try this at home, if you try the two-handed delivery, start slow -- at the line then progress into the actual walking delivery.
The two-handed success of the Bolivia bowling team stems partly from the fact that they are teaching two-handed bowling to the beginning kids and and progressing that into teen and young adult bowling.
Is two-handed bowling for everyone?
Is one-handed bowling for everyone?
Is change necessary?
You be the judge. You come up with your own answer. To be narrow minded means that there is only one answer to each of these questions.
Have a great day and enjoy.
